Loading sub-menu...

Galicaster and Matterhorn, the best match (new)

compared with
Version 15 by developer
on sep 28, 2011 18:24.

Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.

Changes (5)

View Page History


*How GClass Galicaster fits in on Matterhorn?*

Galicaster pose as a basic capture agent but with a big improvement, a friendly easy-to-use interface to ensure the best of each lecture.
Every/Any Galicaster application acts as basics Matterhorn capture agent. It can register as a capture agent, thus being able to receive scheduled recordings and ingest the resulting mediapackages automatically. The main differences with standard Matterhorn capturers is that Galicaster has *graphic interface*, it can be *controlled manually*, it's very *easy to reingest media* and provide *operativity to manage media* such as play, edit metadata, search recordings, and bulk deleting, very useful when dozens of lectures were recorded. \[{color:#ff0000}review last sentence{color}\]


While conected, GClass will communicate with the Matterhorn server, receive scheduled events and return completed recordings. All with the certainty of both and video properly recorde.


When iddle, the Galicaster-Matterhorn unit will work as a wo
rker. So, a part-time worker and capture, all together, a warranty of a good inversion.      !uvigo_deploy.png|align=center,width=679,height=442|thumbnail|thumbnail|thumbnail|thumbnail!